Beyond “Museum” Gardens

With all of the coverage of Michelle Obama in the news lately, you would be a fool not to think that gardens are the answer to all of our public health problems.  In addition to the “White House” garden, you’ve got the new “People’s Garden” at the USDA building in D.C., you’ve got Secretary of Agriculture Vilsack and his wife cheering the establishment of gardens at local Washington D.C. elementary schools.  The public and the food movement should laud these efforts and they are not without merit.  I similarly applaud states like California that began the “Garden in every school,” initiative and I’m glad they have supported that initiative with some funding.  However, it’s like the old proverb, “give a man a fish and he’ll eat for a day, teach him how to fish and he’ll eat for a lifetime.”  Those wonderful intentions without substantial follow through are “paper tigers” against the environmental and health issues that face our public with regards to the food system, most notably: food insecurity, obesity, loss of bio-diversity and environmental degradation. Gardens that exist as exhibitions to only be looked and talked about will not move us anywhere close to where we need to go.  We need this garden movement to move far beyond what Michelle Obama has heroically brought to the nation’s attention.

I want to push beyond the awareness building of the White House garden and I see this garden movement at the crossroads of two paths. One path makes us all feel better, but yields very little in the way of reduced obesity, urban food deserts and local control of food.  The other requires more effort, but actually can affect, not only our local food shed, but more importantly, our children’s nutritional path, future health and prosperity.  Right now, we are on path number 1.  Throughout the United States, if students learn about food in school it is through “museum” gardens.  I call them “museums” because they exemplify our look but don’t touch mentality towards food production. If your child is lucky, their school may grow herbs, some vegetables and receive a lesson or two about nutrition, plants and the growth cycle.  The students may even be able to take home a carrot or munch on it happily.  Then they walk into the corner store, the vegetables disappear and there’s no significant follow up to those isolated nutrition lessons. This could explain why the Associated Press reported that out of 57 federally funded programs of over 1 billion dollars spent to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among children, only 4 succeeded in their task.  We need to shed this museum mentality. Students can no longer stare at our food system from behind protective glass, wearing blindfolds and waiting for the teacher to take them to the food court.  Follow the proverb; we need to hand them that trowel and teach them how to grow.

Our children face an unrelenting obesity epidemic the world has never seen.  A recent study out of the Bloomberg School at Johns Hopkins estimates that 75% of adult Americans will be overweight by 2015.  These numbers have consequences, not only for our health as a nation, but our economy and future prosperity.  One in three children born in the year 2000 will develop diabetes in their lifetime and for minorities that number is one in two.  A recent study by Kenneth Thorpe, the chairman of the Department of Health Policy and Management at Emory University finds that at current trends, by 2018, annual obesity related health care costs will total more than 20 percent of total health care spending.  That means that in less than a decade, health care costs attributable to obesity will have more than doubled. Read More >

Brotherly Love and Sustainable Eats

APHA members tour the Weaver's Way Co-op in Philadelphia in November 2009.

APHA members tour the Weaver's Way Co-op in Philadelphia in November 2009.

At the mammoth American Public Health Association meeting last month in Philadelphia, it was easy to get lost in all the meetings, scientific sessions and special events. Still, 50 people made it to a food system bus tour of some of the city’s sustainable markets and urban farms on the opening day of the conference. On the tour organized by APHA’s Food and Environment Working Group, participants visited Greensgrow Farm, the Urban Nutrition Initiative, Clark Park Farmers’ Market, Milk & Honey Market, Weaver’s Way, the Fair Food Farm Stand at Reading Terminal Market and a healthy corner store site.

A diverse group of food system experts, academics, physicians and students from as far away as Australia joined in eager to see the greener side of Philly’s food scene and share experiences from back home.

“It was a natural fit to have this tour in Philadelphia,” said Lynn Fredericks, founder of FamilyCook Productions in New York City, and a member of the APHA Food and Environment Working Group. “We would like to take the opportunity to explore the food systems within the host cities for our APHA conferences, and in the case of Philly, with such a plethora of innovations within their food system, it was an ideal location to inaugurate this concept.” Read More >

Jesse Kurtz-Nicholl’s Interview with Urban Ag High School Student, Ana Araujo

ana-araujo3In October 2009, Jesse Kurtz-Nicholl sat down with Ana Araujo to discuss the Urban Agriculture and Food Systems class she participated in at Richmond High School in 2008/2009.  The class was a pilot program, which gave the students graduation credit and was centered around the creation of a CSA (Community Supported Agriculture) and direct sale of produce from a middle school farm and the school garden at Richmond High.  10 families received a bi-weekly box of produce for $5, which was planted, tended and grown completely by Richmond High students.  In addition to the garden, the students learned about the American food system, their local food shed and global issues surrounding food.  The students joined working groups in their chosen area of focus to delve deeper into the project.  Students presented their work to the City Council of Richmond as their final project.

What do you think were the best parts of the Urban Ag Class in general?

Answer:
In general, well, I really like the harvest day when we collected the food and we put it in boxes and weighed it.  And I really like planting and like taking care of the garden in general. I’ve always liked that kind of stuff

Q:  Why.  Why do you like that stuff?

Answer:
It seems fun, putting plants, seeing them grow.  You did that.  You planted that.  You saw it grow, you gave it water. You watched it grow.  You did something for the community.  And like it felt good.

Q:  If we were going to run this program again, what do you think needs to be improved.  Was there anything you didn’t like or needs to be changed?

Answer:
If we had more land.  Land to grow and plant, that’d be great.  Because we were really limited in the boxes we made, only 10 every two weeks.  So that was really limited.  If we had more, we could expand on that.

Q:  If you could have anything you wanted, what would you ask for?
Answer:
I’d ask for more. A piece of land, seeds and tools.

Q: Would you want to give a box to every family in the school?
Answer:
Yeah, if we can, if it’s possible with the food we have.

Q:  Would they eat it?
Answer:
I hope.  I mean, if they pay for it, they would eat it.  We should keep the process of having them pay at least 5$ for their food.  Because if they pay for it, they would value the food more.  Otherwise, they’re being given it.

Q:  Do you think, you’ve been personally affected by the program?  Has it changed you in any way?
Answer:
It’s changed me in a way.  But I hope I change more, if I keep being in the program.  Because now I just eat what’s at home.  I used to be like, I don’t want to eat that and I would just go and eat at McDonalds or something.  But now after you told us about how our food is processed, and I’m like, that’s kind of gross.  I don’t want my food going through a bunch of stuff.  I’ve encouraged my mom to buy more fresh meat, more organic meat, but sometimes its not possbile, because its expensive.  But she tries to do it when she can.  So, I’m like, my cow that I’m eating is being fed hormones.  That’s kind of gross. Read More >

What is a family farm?

The Pew Charitable Trusts’ Capitol Hill briefing, yesterday, on Industrial Animal Farms and Worker Health and Safety was informative and compelling. It was also contentious. While Dr. Steven Wing, University of North Carolina epidemiologist and environmental justice expert, discussed the transformation of agricultural practices over the last few decades he was interrupted by a Congressional staffer who took issue with Wing’s statement that many of the family farms are disappearing and being replaced by industrial food animal operations. The interruption was brief, but the issue of “family farms” was raised again during the question and answer session.

Several briefing attendees claimed that their families had owned farming operations for generations, some of whom now run confinement livestock operations, also known as industrial food animal production (IFAP) facilities. Tensions grew when two attendees boisterously expressed their beliefs that even though many family farmers have shifted their farming practices to industrial models that they are still technically running family farms.

Read More >

Thank you, soil.

As we give thanks for sustenance this holiday season, we might tip our hats to the life-supporting organisms living beneath our feet.  Virtually all that we eat, from tofurkey to turkey, originates on fertile soil.  From a consumer’s point of view, the story of a roasted bird begins at the supermarket, but the first chapter in every animal’s life is one of grass and grain converted to flesh.  Fish, too, depend on a delicate food web that begins with land-based nutrients from the soil.  Even the word human originates from the Latin humus (“earth”), the moist, loamy, earthy-smelling black matter from which life springs.

CLF Happy Holidays

As a testament to the soil food web, this year's holiday card features festive dung beetles, protozoa, bacteria and (of course) earthworms.

Read More >

From Russia With Love: Russia widens ban on U.S. pork imports over concerns of antibiotic residues

downloadedfileThe Russians are helping build political will for passage of PAMTA! How has this happened and should we allow foreign influence in our domestic policy to preserve antibiotics for medical treatment? In this case the answer should be a resounding yes since industrial agriculture in the U.S. appears more responsive to the needs and desires of the export market than to the health and safety of the American people. Tom Johnston recently reported on Meatingplace.com that Russia removed three U.S. pork-processing plants from “its list of eligible exporters for findings of oxytetracycline and salmonella exceeding that country’s standards,” as reported by USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service on November 30, 2009. Since December 7 Seaboard Foods’ Guymon, OK slaughterhouse, Farmland Foods’ Denison, IA and Crete, NE pork processing plants can no longer export pork products to Russia. Less than a week later (12/10/09) Reuters reported Russia had widened its ban on U.S. pork imports to 13 U.S. pork plants, including seven Smithfield-owned pork processing facilities. The number of U.S. pork plants still approved for export to Russia, the fifth largest market for U.S. pork, is now down to six from a high of about 40 earlier this year.

The U.S. Trade Representative’s office in Washington expressed concern that “current Russian standards are not based on international standards and do not have a scientific justification.” This sounds like Pork Council language to those of us who have witnessed the distortion and manipulation of scientific data by the industry. Read More >

Pew to Brief Congress of CAFO Impacts on Workers, Communities

picture-3On the heels of CLF’s Congressional Briefing Dec. 2, the Pew Environmental Group will be holding a Capitol Hill briefing tomorrow to discuss the impact on workers and communities of CAFO’s. The briefing, Industrial Animal Farms and Worker Health and Safety, is being held in collaboration with Rep. Raúl Grijalva, Co-Chair, Congressional Progressive Caucus. It is scheduled for Thursday, Dec. 17, from 10 – 11:30 am at the US Capitol, Room HC-8. Please RSVP to Shannon Heyck-Williams if you plan to attend.

In the Dec. 2 briefing, leading experts in economics, public health and public policy and Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY), a leading voice on antibiotic resistance, discussed the impact of resistant infections on the U.S. healthcare system and the need to phase out inappropriate use of antibiotics as growth promoters in the production of food animals. The Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future (CLF) hosted the event with Rep. Slaughter.

The economic burden of antibiotic resistance on the American healthcare system is measurable and staggering. In 2008, the Institute of Medicine reported that antibiotic-resistant bacteria, including MRSA, cost the U.S. $4-5 billion a year. Accordingly, the CDC estimates that 2 million Americans contract resistant infections and out of those, 90,000 die. A full recap of that briefing can be found here.

Oyster restoration and aquaculture: Follow up from a NOAA scientist

After the December 7, 2009 post about the Eastern oyster’s (Crassostrea virginica) decline in the Chesapeake Bay, Dr. Kelly Goodwin, a scientist at NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC), informed me of a parallel story for California abalone species. Dr. Goodwin says:

The peak decades for the commercial harvest of California abalone occurred after WWII; however, concerns about overharvest and localized extinction were noted as early as 1913. Currently no commercial abalone harvest of any species is allowed in California, and recreational harvest is allowed only for red abalone (Haliotis rufescens) north of San Francisco, via free diving and with low bag limits.

[Aside from overharvesting] ocean warming can have profound effects on abalone populations due to complex direct and indirect effects. Thermal stress can result in direct mortality and can also exacerbate the effects of disease.

NOAA is actively involved in the spawning and rearing of abalone species. As part of the recovery efforts for white abalone, the SWFSC has been developing culture techniques for pink abalone, H. corrugata, a close relative of the white abalone. Pink abalone serve as a surrogate species that can be used to test methods of disease detection, disease treatment, and disease prevention without the risk of using an endangered species.

Is CAFO Meat Legal?

The New York Times’ Mark Bittman poses the interesting question in yesterday’s column, “Could Industrially Raised Meat Be Illegal?” Bittman pontificates that if the EPA has classified greenhouse gases as a human health hazard “as the EPA has declared, and the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act authorizes strict regulatory action on substances if there’s a reasonable basis to conclude that there’s an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, and industrially raised livestock causes an estimated 18 percent of greenhouse gas, could there be a legal case for tougher regulation of animal production?” Interesting thought.

New Mexico Dairy CAFO Controversy on NPR

Dairy CAFOs in New Mexico are under increased scrutiny today following this morning’s report from NPR’s John Burnett. The reporter discusses the unrelenting pollution caused by large dairy operations in the state along “dairy row,” a section of Interstate 10 between Las  Cruces, NM, and El Paso, TX.  ”Everyday, an average cow produces six to seven gallons of milk and 18 gallons of manure,” Burnett tells listeners. “New Mexico has 300,000 milk cows. That totals 5.4 million gallons of manure in the state every day. It’s enough to fill up nine Olympic-size pools. Every single day,” he says. It’s worth a read or listen to. There are photos and audio on NPR’s web site.